Solutions
Capabilities
Research
About Us
AI TrainingPartners
Contact UsBook a Call
Emerging Capability

Computing at the Edge of
Physics & Intelligence

Presear researches and develops quantum AI solutions — variational quantum circuits, quantum kernels, hybrid classical-quantum algorithms, and quantum optimisation — for problems beyond classical computational reach.

1000×
Potential Speedup on Specific Problems
Qiskit & PennyLane
Certified Quantum Toolkits
15+
Quantum AI Prototypes Delivered
|0⟩ |1⟩ |ψ⟩

Technical Depth

Six Quantum AI Techniques We Research & Build

From variational algorithms to hybrid pipelines — quantum AI approaches matched to the problems that benefit most from quantum advantage.

Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE)

Using parameterised quantum circuits optimised by classical gradient methods to find ground-state energies of molecular Hamiltonians — the key computational challenge in drug discovery and materials science. VQE is among the most promising near-term quantum algorithms for chemistry simulation, outperforming classical methods on specific molecular systems.

Molecular SimulationPennyLaneVariational Circuits

Quantum Approximate Optimisation (QAOA)

Applying quantum circuits to combinatorial optimisation problems — portfolio selection, route optimisation, network design, and scheduling — where the solution space is too vast for classical exhaustive search. QAOA encodes constraints as quantum Hamiltonians and finds approximate optimal solutions with potential polynomial speedups.

Combinatorial OptGraph ProblemsQiskit

Quantum Kernel Methods

Mapping classical data into exponentially large Hilbert spaces using quantum feature maps — creating kernels for SVM classification that may be hard for classical computers to compute efficiently. Quantum kernels offer potential advantages for specific structured datasets, particularly in genomics, financial time series, and materials property prediction.

Quantum SVMFeature MapsHilbert Space

Quantum Neural Networks (QNN)

Designing variational quantum circuits as trainable neural network layers — with quantum data encoding, parameterised rotations, and measurement as the output layer. QNNs are trained using gradient-based optimisation (parameter shift rule) and can be composed with classical neural layers in hybrid architectures for practical ML tasks.

PQCHybrid ArchitectureTF Quantum

Quantum Annealing for Optimisation

Leveraging D-Wave quantum annealers to solve QUBO (Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation) problems — logistics scheduling, financial portfolio optimisation, traffic routing, and network design — by physically evolving toward minimum energy configurations that correspond to optimal solutions.

D-WaveQUBO FormulationAnnealing

Hybrid Classical-Quantum Pipelines

Architecting systems where quantum processors handle the computationally hard subroutines while classical computers manage data processing, optimiser loops, and result post-processing. Hybrid pipelines are the practical path to quantum advantage today — using quantum hardware for targeted tasks where it provides genuine speedup over classical alternatives.

Hybrid ArchitectureQuantum SubroutinesClassical Orchestration

How We Work

From Classical Problem to Quantum-Accelerated Solution

A rigorous five-stage process — from suitability assessment to hybrid deployment and benchmarking — for quantum AI engagements.

1
Suitability Assessment
2
Algorithm Design
3
Circuit Implementation
4
Hardware Testing
5
Hybrid Deployment

Step 01 — Problem Suitability Assessment

Identifying Where Quantum Offers Genuine Advantage

Not every problem benefits from quantum computing — and we say so honestly. We map your problem structure to known quantum advantage regimes: combinatorial optimisation, molecular simulation, linear systems, and kernel methods — then quantify the expected speedup against best classical benchmarks.

  • Problem structure analysis
  • Quantum advantage mapping
  • Classical baseline benchmarking
  • Honest ROI assessment

Step 02 — Quantum Algorithm Design

Translating Business Problems into Quantum Formulations

We translate the business problem into a quantum-compatible formulation — QUBO for annealing, Hamiltonian for VQE/QAOA, or kernel definition for QSVMs. Algorithm selection balances the target advantage against noise sensitivity, qubit requirements, and circuit depth achievable on near-term hardware.

  • Quantum formulation design
  • Algorithm family selection
  • Noise sensitivity analysis
  • Qubit requirement estimation

Step 03 — Circuit Implementation & Simulation

Building & Validating Quantum Circuits in Simulation

Circuits are implemented in Qiskit or PennyLane and first validated on state-vector simulators for correctness, then on noisy simulators to characterise hardware error sensitivity. Classical simulation allows rapid iteration before spending quantum hardware time on circuit validation.

  • Qiskit / PennyLane implementation
  • State-vector correctness validation
  • Noisy simulator testing
  • Circuit depth optimisation

Step 04 — Quantum Hardware Testing

Running on Real Quantum Processors via Cloud Access

Validated circuits are executed on IBM Quantum, Google Quantum AI (Cirq), or Amazon Braket hardware. We apply error mitigation techniques (zero-noise extrapolation, measurement error mitigation) to improve result quality on NISQ devices and benchmark against classical simulation results.

  • IBM / Google / AWS Braket access
  • Error mitigation techniques
  • Hardware vs simulation comparison
  • Qubit calibration analysis

Step 05 — Hybrid Deployment & Benchmarking

Integrating Quantum Subroutines into Production Pipelines

The quantum subroutine is integrated into a classical pipeline — with the classical system handling data encoding, result post-processing, and fallback logic when hardware is unavailable. Comprehensive benchmarking compares the hybrid system against classical baselines across problem size, accuracy, and runtime dimensions.

  • Hybrid pipeline integration
  • Classical fallback design
  • Scalability benchmarking
  • Quantum advantage quantification

Real-World Impact

Quantum AI Prototypes with Measurable Results

Quantum AI is early-stage — but specific problem classes are already showing compelling quantum advantage over classical methods.

Drug Molecule Simulation

Pharma / BioTech

Core Challenge

Classical computers cannot exactly simulate the quantum mechanical behaviour of molecules larger than ~50 atoms — the key bottleneck in computational drug discovery. This forces the use of approximations that miss crucial electron correlation effects, leading to poor binding affinity predictions.

Who Benefits

Pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, and materials science researchers who need accurate ground-state energy calculations for target molecules — enabling better prediction of drug binding, reaction mechanisms, and material properties without wet-lab synthesis at every iteration.

VQEMolecular HamiltoniansQiskit Nature
Request Case Study

Portfolio Optimisation

Finance

Core Challenge

Mean-variance portfolio optimisation with realistic constraints (turnover limits, sector exposure, ESG constraints) is NP-hard as the number of assets grows. Classical heuristics find locally optimal solutions that may leave significant return-per-unit-risk on the table.

Who Benefits

Asset managers, hedge funds, and wealth management platforms that run portfolio optimisation over large asset universes (500+ securities) with complex regulatory constraints — and need solutions that are provably closer to global optima than classical heuristics provide.

QAOAD-Wave AnnealingQUBO
Request Case Study

Post-Quantum Cryptography

Defence / Finance

Core Challenge

Quantum computers running Shor's algorithm will break RSA and ECC encryption — the backbone of today's internet security — once fault-tolerant quantum hardware matures. Organisations that encrypt today's sensitive data face "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks from adversaries stockpiling ciphertext.

Who Benefits

Defence contractors, financial institutions, and critical infrastructure operators handling data with decade-long sensitivity that need to assess quantum cryptographic risk and begin migrating to NIST-approved post-quantum cryptographic standards before quantum computers reach cryptographically relevant scale.

PQC MigrationNIST StandardsRisk Assessment
Request Case Study

Logistics Route Optimisation

Supply Chain

Core Challenge

Vehicle routing with time windows, capacity constraints, and multi-depot configurations is a computationally hard combinatorial problem. As fleet sizes and delivery point counts grow into the thousands, classical exact solvers fail and heuristics leave 10–20% efficiency on the table.

Who Benefits

Logistics operators, courier networks, and last-mile delivery companies managing large fleets across complex urban networks who need route solutions that are computed faster and are closer to optimal — reducing fuel consumption, delivery windows, and operational costs.

QAOA / AnnealingVRPHybrid Solver
Request Case Study

Powered By

Our Quantum AI Technology Ecosystem

Leading quantum frameworks, hardware platforms, and classical computing tools — for hybrid quantum-classical development and deployment.

Qiskit (IBM)Quantum SDK
PennyLaneQuantum ML
Cirq (Google)Quantum Circuits
Amazon BraketQuantum Cloud
IBM QuantumQuantum Hardware
D-WaveQuantum Annealing
TF QuantumHybrid ML
PyTorchClassical Layer
NumPy / SciPyNumerical Computing
JupyterResearch Environment
DockerContainerisation
PythonPrimary Language

Frequently Asked

Quantum AI Questions

What CTOs, research leads, and innovation teams ask before engaging Presear Softwares on quantum AI initiatives.

Ask Our Quantum Team
Is quantum AI ready for production use today?
For most business problems — no. Current quantum hardware (NISQ devices) has limited qubit counts, high error rates, and short coherence times that restrict the complexity of circuits that can run reliably. However, for specific problem classes — molecular simulation at small scales, constrained optimisation with D-Wave annealing, and quantum kernel methods on structured data — near-term quantum systems already show competitive or superior results to classical approaches. We're honest about where quantum genuinely helps and where classical methods remain superior.
What problems benefit most from quantum computing?
The strongest near-term candidates are: (1) Molecular simulation — quantum mechanics is naturally simulated by quantum systems; (2) Combinatorial optimisation — portfolio selection, routing, scheduling problems with discrete variables and complex constraints; (3) Cryptography — Shor's algorithm and quantum-resistant encryption design; (4) Quantum machine learning — specific kernel methods on structured high-dimensional data. We conduct a suitability assessment before any engagement to confirm whether your problem falls into these categories.
Do you use real quantum hardware or only simulators?
Both — in appropriate sequence. We develop and validate on classical simulators first (faster, cheaper, no queue time), then run on real quantum hardware via cloud access to IBM Quantum, Google Quantum AI, or Amazon Braket. Simulation results and hardware results are compared to characterise noise sensitivity. For optimisation problems requiring annealing, we access D-Wave systems directly. Real hardware is used when the simulation-to-hardware gap is critical to assess.
How does a hybrid classical-quantum system work?
In a hybrid system, a classical computer orchestrates the overall workflow and handles data processing, while a quantum processor is called as a subroutine for the computationally hard component — the part where quantum provides a speedup. Results from the quantum processor are returned to the classical system for post-processing, decision-making, and the next iteration. Variational algorithms like VQE and QAOA are inherently hybrid — the classical optimizer updates the quantum circuit parameters in each training loop.
What's the realistic timeline to quantum advantage for our industry?
This depends heavily on the problem type and industry. For molecular simulation in drug discovery, limited quantum advantage on specific small molecules is demonstrable now. For broadly useful fault-tolerant quantum advantage on enterprise-scale optimisation problems, most credible estimates point to the 2028–2035 window — dependent on error correction progress. We help clients build quantum readiness now — understanding the technology, identifying relevant use cases, and developing internal expertise — so they can move fast when hardware matures.
Quantum AI

Ready to Explore Quantum AI for
Problems Beyond Classical Reach?

Partner with Presear Softwares to assess your quantum readiness, prototype hybrid algorithms, and position your organisation at the frontier of quantum-accelerated intelligence.